Well, you may wonder why am I still dwelling on this when I should be writing something on Christmas since it is only days away but I just can't help it. Honestly, I am not sure whether I should laugh or get angry by statements made by our AG.
In today's NST Online under the article, "Gani: It was the fairest thing to do", we read the following comments made by the AG:
"I can be very strict, but I don't think this is the right time to be," he said.
"When we exercise the law, we have to look at it fairly. It is my judgment that this is the fairest thing to do. "
And his main reason for dropping the murder charges?
"When we exercise the law, we have to look at it fairly. It is my judgment that this is the fairest thing to do. "
And his main reason for dropping the murder charges?
The decision to withdraw the charges of attempted murder against the 31 men was the best course of action in light of public and national interest, Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail said yesterday.
Honestly, does the AG assume that by evoking "in light of public and national interest", somehow we will overlook his gross incompetency? Or that summoning his will to be lenient, he is therefore seen as merciful? I wonder whether he was emotionally charged when he realised an enforcement officer was injured as a result of getting his head bashed with a brick and therefore decided to have a go at the Hindraf 31 by charging them with attempted murder to score some political mileage. If he has simply charge them in court with illegal assembly charges would have been understandable but he has to outdo the village idiot by making the following statements:
"We can't pinpoint who exactly did it or rather who was the one who 'threw the brick' at the person who was badly injured."
Gani said the 31 men were initially charged not because they were alleged to be Hindraf members but because they had committed an offence by participating in an illegal assembly.
Source: http://www.thisshirtrocks.com/Product/Shirts/1553/flippin-idiot.html
Honestly, does the AG assume that by evoking "in light of public and national interest", somehow we will overlook his gross incompetency? Or that summoning his will to be lenient, he is therefore seen as merciful? I wonder whether he was emotionally charged when he realised an enforcement officer was injured as a result of getting his head bashed with a brick and therefore decided to have a go at the Hindraf 31 by charging them with attempted murder to score some political mileage. If he has simply charge them in court with illegal assembly charges would have been understandable but he has to outdo the village idiot by making the following statements:
"We can't pinpoint who exactly did it or rather who was the one who 'threw the brick' at the person who was badly injured."
Gani said the 31 men were initially charged not because they were alleged to be Hindraf members but because they had committed an offence by participating in an illegal assembly.
Source: http://www.thisshirtrocks.com/Product/Shirts/1553/flippin-idiot.htmlLook, Gani if you didn't do your homework and ensure that you have a case to prove beyond reasonable doubt that these Hindraf 31 are the murderers who threw the brick, please don't waste the time and resources of the courts to prove you are an emotionally charged idiot. Can't you differentiate between participation in an illegal assembly and murder attempt?
No comments:
Post a Comment